博客
关于我
强烈建议你试试无所不能的chatGPT,快点击我
关于分区索引与全局索引性能比较的示例
阅读量:5852 次
发布时间:2019-06-19

本文共 11105 字,大约阅读时间需要 37 分钟。

说明:之前使用range分区做出来的效果不明显,这次使用hash分区。

1、准备工作:

----创建两张一样的hash分区表,jacks_part和echos_part------------------  1 SQL> create table jacks_part (owner varchar2(30),object_id number,object_name varchar2(128)) 2   2     partition by hash(object_id) 3   3  partitions 30; 4  5 Table created. 6  7 SQL> create table echos_part (owner varchar2(30),object_id number,object_name varchar2(128)) 8   2     partition by hash(object_id) 9   3  partitions 30;                                            10 11 Table created.12  ----分别向两张表插入一些记录----------------- 13 SQL> insert into jacks_part select owner,object_id,object_name from dba_objects;14 15 72196 rows created.16 17 SQL> insert into echos_part select owner,object_id,object_name from jacks_part;18 19 72196 rows created.20 21 SQL> commit;22 23 Commit complete.24  ----分别创建global索引和local索引--------------- 25 SQL> create index globals_ind on jacks_part(object_id)26   2   global partition by hash(object_id);27 28 Index created.29 30 SQL> create index locals_ind on echos_part(object_id) local;31 32 Index created.33  ----查询索引是否正确-------------------------- 34 SQL> select index_name,table_name,locality from user_part_indexes;35 36 INDEX_NAME                 TABLE_NAME              LOCALI37 ------------------ ------------------------------ ------38 LOCALS_IND                ECHOS_PART                LOCAL39 GLOBALS_IND               JACKS_PART               GLOBAL

 

2、分区索引性能优于全局索引的例子:

1 SQL> set linesize 200; 2 SQL> set autotrace traceonly; 3 SQL> select /*+ index(echos_part,locals_ind) */ * from  echos_part where object_id>100; 4  5 72097 rows selected. 6  7  8 Execution Plan 9 ----------------------------------------------------------10 Plan hash value: 309281521111 12 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 | Id  | Operation               | Name    | Rows    | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    | Pstart| Pstop |14 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------15 |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT           |        |  4228 |   396K|    89   (0)| 00:00:02 |    |    |16 |   1 |  PARTITION HASH ALL           |        |  4228 |   396K|    89   (0)| 00:00:02 |     1 |    30 |17 |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| ECHOS_PART |  4228 |   396K|    89   (0)| 00:00:02 |     1 |    30 |18 |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN           | LOCALS_IND |  4228 |    |    25   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    30 |19 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------20 21 Predicate Information (identified by operation id):22 ---------------------------------------------------23 24    3 - access("OBJECT_ID">100)25 26 Note27 -----28    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)29 30 31 Statistics32 ----------------------------------------------------------33       0    recursive calls34       0    db block gets35    10562   consistent gets36       0    physical reads37       0    redo size38   3128267  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client39    53285   bytes received via SQL*Net from client40    4808    SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client41       0    sorts (memory)42       0    sorts (disk)43    72097   rows processed44 45 SQL> select /*+ index(jacks_part,globals_ind) */ * from  jacks_part where object_id>100;46 47 72097 rows selected.48 49 50 Execution Plan51 ----------------------------------------------------------52 Plan hash value: 250144835253 54 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------55 | Id  | Operation                | Name      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time      | Pstart| Pstop |56 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------57 |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |          |  2500 |   234K|  4639   (1)| 00:00:56 |      |      |58 |   1 |  PARTITION HASH SINGLE            |          |  2500 |   234K|  4639   (1)| 00:00:56 |    1 |    1 |59 |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| JACKS_PART  |  2500 |   234K|  4639   (1)| 00:00:56 | ROWID | ROWID |60 |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN            | GLOBALS_IND |  2500 |      |    15   (0)| 00:00:01 |    1 |    1 |61 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------62 63 Predicate Information (identified by operation id):64 ---------------------------------------------------65 66    3 - access("OBJECT_ID">100)67 68 Note69 -----70    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)71 72 73 Statistics74 ----------------------------------------------------------75       0    recursive calls76       0    db block gets77    74718   consistent gets78       0    physical reads79       0    redo size80   3077218  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client81    53285   bytes received via SQL*Net from client82     4808   SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client83       0    sorts (memory)84       0    sorts (disk)85    72097   rows processed

 

3、分区索引性能低于全局索引的例子1:

1 SQL> select /*+ index(echos_part,locals_ind) */ count(*) from  echos_part where object_id>100; 2  3  4 Execution Plan 5 ---------------------------------------------------------- 6 Plan hash value: 2317569636 7  8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 | Id  | Operation        | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |         |     1 |    13 |    25   (0)| 00:00:01 |     |     |12 |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE     |         |     1 |    13 |          |      |     |     |13 |   2 |   PARTITION HASH ALL|         |  4228 | 54964 |    25   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    30 |14 |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | LOCALS_IND |  4228 | 54964 |    25   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    30 |15 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 17 Predicate Information (identified by operation id):18 ---------------------------------------------------19 20    3 - access("OBJECT_ID">100)21 22 Note23 -----24    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)25 26 27 Statistics28 ----------------------------------------------------------29       0  recursive calls30       0  db block gets31     205  consistent gets32       0  physical reads33       0  redo size34     424  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client35     419  bytes received via SQL*Net from client36       2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client37       0  sorts (memory)38       0  sorts (disk)39       1  rows processed40 41 SQL> select /*+ index(jacks_part,globals_ind) */ count(*) from  jacks_part where object_id>100;42 43 44 Execution Plan45 ----------------------------------------------------------46 Plan hash value: 247812913747 48 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------49 | Id  | Operation           | Name         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------51 |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT       |         |       1 |      13 |      15   (0)| 00:00:01 |         |         |52 |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE        |         |       1 |      13 |          |         |         |         |53 |   2 |   PARTITION HASH SINGLE|         |    2500 | 32500 |      15   (0)| 00:00:01 |       1 |       1 |54 |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN    | GLOBALS_IND |    2500 | 32500 |      15   (0)| 00:00:01 |       1 |       1 |55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------56 57 Predicate Information (identified by operation id):58 ---------------------------------------------------59 60    3 - access("OBJECT_ID">100)61 62 Note63 -----64    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)65 66 67 Statistics68 ----------------------------------------------------------69       0  recursive calls70       0  db block gets71     201  consistent gets72       0  physical reads73       0  redo size74     424  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client75     419  bytes received via SQL*Net from client76       2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client77       0  sorts (memory)78       0  sorts (disk)79       1  rows processed

 分区索引性能低于全局索引的例子2:

1 SQL> drop index globals_ind; 2  3 Index dropped. 4  5 SQL> create index global_indexs on jacks_part(object_id) global; 6  7 Index created. 8  9 SQL> select /*+ index(echos_part,locals_ind) */ count(*) from  echos_part where object_id>100;10 11 12 13 Execution Plan14 ----------------------------------------------------------15 Plan hash value: 231756963616 17 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 | Id  | Operation        | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |19 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------20 |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |         |     1 |     5 |   175   (0)| 00:00:03 |     |     |21 |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE     |         |     1 |     5 |          |      |     |     |22 |   2 |   PARTITION HASH ALL|         | 72101 |   352K|   175   (0)| 00:00:03 |     1 |    30 |23 |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | LOCALS_IND | 72101 |   352K|   175   (0)| 00:00:03 |     1 |    30 |24 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------25 26 Predicate Information (identified by operation id):27 ---------------------------------------------------28 29    3 - access("OBJECT_ID">100)30 31 32 Statistics33 ----------------------------------------------------------34    1704  recursive calls35       0  db block gets36     437  consistent gets37     206  physical reads38       0  redo size39 40 SQL> select /*+ index(jacks_part,global_indexs) */ count(*) from  jacks_part where object_id>100;41 42 43 Execution Plan44 ----------------------------------------------------------45 Plan hash value: 101656623846 47 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------48 | Id  | Operation      | Name      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time      |49 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------50 |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |          |    1 |    5 |   201   (0)| 00:00:03 |51 |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE   |          |    1 |    5 |           |      |52 |*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN| GLOBAL_INDEXS | 72101 |   352K|   201   (0)| 00:00:03 |53 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------54 55 Predicate Information (identified by operation id):56 ---------------------------------------------------57 58    2 - access("OBJECT_ID">100)59 60 61 Statistics62 ----------------------------------------------------------63       1  recursive calls64       0  db block gets65     201  consistent gets66     200  physical reads67       0  redo size

 

 

转载地址:http://uxsjx.baihongyu.com/

你可能感兴趣的文章
Team Name
查看>>
[LeetCode] Palindrome Linked List 回文链表
查看>>
UVA-10212 The Last Non-zero Digit. 分解质因子+容斥定理
查看>>
大数据公司Palantir融得7亿美元 曾追踪拉登
查看>>
建立备份策略的重要性
查看>>
发力IoT领域 Marvell注重生态系统发展
查看>>
你应该知道的 RPC 原理
查看>>
Ubuntu安装词典
查看>>
Spring解析
查看>>
RedHat6 管理应用服务【11】
查看>>
stm32F10x复习-1
查看>>
Linux命令操作大全
查看>>
从周五开始香港主机特别慢,香港主机用户有同感吗?
查看>>
Ember.js 3.9.0-beta.3 发布,JavaScript Web 应用开发框架
查看>>
python标准库00 学习准备
查看>>
4.2. PHP crypt()
查看>>
commonservice-config配置服务搭建
查看>>
连接池的意义及阿里Druid
查看>>
ComponentOne 2019V1火热来袭!全面支持 Visual Studio 2019——亮点之WinForm篇
查看>>
Python递归函数与匿名函数
查看>>